Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Ascending Aortic Stiffness Analysis Using Tissue Doppler Imaging for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Suspected Stable Angina: A Retrospective Study

Received: 31 March 2024    Accepted: 27 April 2024    Published: 17 May 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) and arterial stiffening may coexist. Stable angina pectoris (SAP) is one of the common types of CAD. However, the association between SAP and aortic stiffness metrics remains poorly understood. Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) measurement of ascending aorta motion velocity may be used to employed to assess the elastic properties of the great arteries. We hypothesized that non-CAD individuals may exhibit higher. TDI velocities in the ascending aorta. Aim: To explore the correlation between ascending aortic stiffness and SAP using parameters derived from two-dimensional and TDI echocardiography of the ascending aorta. Methods: This study comprised 118 patients with clinically suspected SAP. Two-dimensional echocardiography, TDI, electrocardiogram (ECG), and coronary angiography (CAG) were performed on all patients. Patients with coronary lumen area stenosis ≥70% were categorized as having significant CAD (CAD Group n=57) and were compared with patients without significant CAD (non-CAD Group n=61). Using TDI, aortic systolic velocity (SAo), early diastolic velocity (EAo), and late diastolic velocity (AAo) were measured from the anterior wall of the ascending aorta 3 cm above the aortic cusps in the parasternal long-axis view. Aortic stiffness index (β), aortic distensibility (D), and pressure-strain elastic modulus (Ep) were calculated from aortic diameters measured by two-dimensional M-mode echocardiography and blood pressure obtained by sphygmomanometry. Results: SAo was significantly higher in the non-CAD group (11.70 ±1.53 cm/s vs.12.80 ±2.21 cm/s, p < 0.05). EAo and AAo velocities of ascending aorta were similar in control and CAD groups. Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) for diagnosing non-CAD, the optimal cut-off value of SAo was ≥13.35 cm/s (sensitivity, 85.96%; specificity, 40.98%; area under curve (AUC)=0.64; P<0.05). There was a significant correlation between SAo velocity and β (r=−0.34, P<0.05), D (r=0.32, P<0.05) and Ep (r =−0.29, P<0.05). Conclusions: Arterial stiffness is lower in patients without significant CAD. Measuring SAo of the anterior ascending aorta using TDI echocardiography has good sensitivity but poor specificity in patients without significant coronary artery stenosis in SAP.

Published in World Journal of Public Health (Volume 9, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.wjph.20240902.17
Page(s) 177-185
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Aortic Stiffness, Coronary Artery Disease, Tissue Doppler Imaging, Stable Angina Pectoris, Echocardiography

References
[1] JOSHI P H, DE LEMOS J A. Diagnosis and Management of Stable Angina: A Review [J]. Jama, 2021, 325(17): 1765-78.
[2] ADEVA-ANDANY M M, ADEVA-CONTRERAS L, FERNáNDEZ-FERNáNDEZ C, et al. Elastic tissue disruption is a major pathogenic factor to human vascular disease [J]. Molecular biology reports, 2021, 48(5): 4865-78.
[3] DOMANIN M, BISSACCO D, ROMAROWSKY R M, et al. Drag Forces after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair. General Review of the Literature [J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2021, 75: 479-88.
[4] ANGOFF R, MOSARLA R C, TSAO C W. Aortic Stiffness: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Relevant Biomarkers [J]. Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021, 8: 709396.
[5] COCCIOLONE A J, HAWES J Z, STAICULESCU M C, et al. Elastin, arterial mechanics, and cardiovascular disease [J]. American journal of physiology Heart and circulatory physiology, 2018, 315(2): H189-h205.
[6] OHMAN E M. CLINICAL PRACTICE. Chronic Stable Angina [J]. N Engl J Med, 2016, 374(12): 1167-76.
[7] BALLA C, PAVASINI R, FERRARI R. Treatment of Angina: Where Are We? [J]. Cardiology, 2018, 140(1): 52-67.
[8] HOFFMANN S, JENSEN J S, IVERSEN A Z, et al. Tissue Doppler echocardiography improves the diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis in stable angina pectoris [J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2012, 13(9): 724-9.
[9] SALVI P, SCALISE F, ROVINA M, et al. Noninvasive Estimation of Aortic Stiffness Through Different Approaches Comparison With Intra-Aortic Recordings [J]. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex: 1979), 2019, 74(1): 117-29.
[10] LAURENT S, BOUTOUYRIE P. Arterial stiffness: a new surrogate end point for cardiovascular disease? [J]. Journal of nephrology, 2007, 20 Suppl 12: S45-50.
[11] CECELJA M, CHOWIENCZYK P. Role of arterial stiffness in cardiovascular disease [J]. JRSM cardiovascular disease, 2012, 1(4).
[12] WANG K L, CHENG H M, CHUANG S Y, et al. Central or peripheral systolic or pulse pressure: which best relates to target organs and future mortality? [J]. Journal of hypertension, 2009, 27(3): 461-7.
[13] NAMASIVAYAM M, ADJI A, O'ROURKE M F. Influence of aortic pressure wave components determined noninvasively on myocardial oxygen demand in men and women [J]. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex: 1979), 2011, 57(2): 193-200.
[14] WITTEMAN J C, GROBBEE D E, VALKENBURG H A, et al. J-shaped relation between change in diastolic blood pressure and progression of aortic atherosclerosis [J]. Lancet (London, England), 1994, 343(8896): 504-7.
[15] GHADERI F, SAMIM H, KEIHANIAN F, et al. The predictive role of aortic propagation velocity for coronary artery disease [J]. BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2018, 18(1): 121.
[16] LAURENT S, BOUTOUYRIE P, CUNHA P G, et al. Concept of Extremes in Vascular Aging [J]. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex: 1979), 2019, 74(2): 218-28.
[17] MIKAEL L R, PAIVA A M G, GOMES M M, et al. Vascular Aging and Arterial Stiffness [J]. Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2017, 109(3): 253-8.
[18] KIM S A, PARK S M, KIM M N, et al. The relationship between mechanical properties of carotid artery and coronary artery disease [J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2012, 13(7): 568-73.
[19] DUMOR K, SHOEMAKER-MOYLE M, NISTALA R, et al. Arterial Stiffness in Hypertension: an Update [J]. Current hypertension reports, 2018, 20(8): 72.
[20] HARADA K, YASUOKA K, SHIMADA Y. Usefulness of tissue doppler imaging for assessing aortic wall stiffness in children with the Marfan syndrome [J]. The American journal of cardiology, 2004, 93(8): 1072-5.
[21] VITARELLI A, GIORDANO M, GERMANò G, et al. Assessment of ascending aorta wall stiffness in hypertensive patients by tissue Doppler imaging and strain Doppler echocardiography [J]. Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2010, 96(18): 1469-74.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Wang, L., Chen, X., Yang, F. (2024). Ascending Aortic Stiffness Analysis Using Tissue Doppler Imaging for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Suspected Stable Angina: A Retrospective Study. World Journal of Public Health, 9(2), 177-185. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20240902.17

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Wang, L.; Chen, X.; Yang, F. Ascending Aortic Stiffness Analysis Using Tissue Doppler Imaging for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Suspected Stable Angina: A Retrospective Study. World J. Public Health 2024, 9(2), 177-185. doi: 10.11648/j.wjph.20240902.17

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Wang L, Chen X, Yang F. Ascending Aortic Stiffness Analysis Using Tissue Doppler Imaging for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Suspected Stable Angina: A Retrospective Study. World J Public Health. 2024;9(2):177-185. doi: 10.11648/j.wjph.20240902.17

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.wjph.20240902.17,
      author = {Ling Wang and XiangYu Chen and Feng Yang},
      title = {Ascending Aortic Stiffness Analysis Using Tissue Doppler Imaging for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Suspected Stable Angina: A Retrospective Study},
      journal = {World Journal of Public Health},
      volume = {9},
      number = {2},
      pages = {177-185},
      doi = {10.11648/j.wjph.20240902.17},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20240902.17},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjph.20240902.17},
      abstract = {Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) and arterial stiffening may coexist. Stable angina pectoris (SAP) is one of the common types of CAD. However, the association between SAP and aortic stiffness metrics remains poorly understood. Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) measurement of ascending aorta motion velocity may be used to employed to assess the elastic properties of the great arteries. We hypothesized that non-CAD individuals may exhibit higher. TDI velocities in the ascending aorta. Aim: To explore the correlation between ascending aortic stiffness and SAP using parameters derived from two-dimensional and TDI echocardiography of the ascending aorta. Methods: This study comprised 118 patients with clinically suspected SAP. Two-dimensional echocardiography, TDI, electrocardiogram (ECG), and coronary angiography (CAG) were performed on all patients. Patients with coronary lumen area stenosis ≥70% were categorized as having significant CAD (CAD Group n=57) and were compared with patients without significant CAD (non-CAD Group n=61). Using TDI, aortic systolic velocity (SAo), early diastolic velocity (EAo), and late diastolic velocity (AAo) were measured from the anterior wall of the ascending aorta 3 cm above the aortic cusps in the parasternal long-axis view. Aortic stiffness index (β), aortic distensibility (D), and pressure-strain elastic modulus (Ep) were calculated from aortic diameters measured by two-dimensional M-mode echocardiography and blood pressure obtained by sphygmomanometry. Results: SAo was significantly higher in the non-CAD group (11.70 ±1.53 cm/s vs.12.80 ±2.21 cm/s, p < 0.05). EAo and AAo velocities of ascending aorta were similar in control and CAD groups. Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) for diagnosing non-CAD, the optimal cut-off value of SAo was ≥13.35 cm/s (sensitivity, 85.96%; specificity, 40.98%; area under curve (AUC)=0.64; P<0.05). There was a significant correlation between SAo velocity and β (r=−0.34, P<0.05), D (r=0.32, P<0.05) and Ep (r =−0.29, P<0.05). Conclusions: Arterial stiffness is lower in patients without significant CAD. Measuring SAo of the anterior ascending aorta using TDI echocardiography has good sensitivity but poor specificity in patients without significant coronary artery stenosis in SAP.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Ascending Aortic Stiffness Analysis Using Tissue Doppler Imaging for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Suspected Stable Angina: A Retrospective Study
    AU  - Ling Wang
    AU  - XiangYu Chen
    AU  - Feng Yang
    Y1  - 2024/05/17
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20240902.17
    DO  - 10.11648/j.wjph.20240902.17
    T2  - World Journal of Public Health
    JF  - World Journal of Public Health
    JO  - World Journal of Public Health
    SP  - 177
    EP  - 185
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2637-6059
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20240902.17
    AB  - Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) and arterial stiffening may coexist. Stable angina pectoris (SAP) is one of the common types of CAD. However, the association between SAP and aortic stiffness metrics remains poorly understood. Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) measurement of ascending aorta motion velocity may be used to employed to assess the elastic properties of the great arteries. We hypothesized that non-CAD individuals may exhibit higher. TDI velocities in the ascending aorta. Aim: To explore the correlation between ascending aortic stiffness and SAP using parameters derived from two-dimensional and TDI echocardiography of the ascending aorta. Methods: This study comprised 118 patients with clinically suspected SAP. Two-dimensional echocardiography, TDI, electrocardiogram (ECG), and coronary angiography (CAG) were performed on all patients. Patients with coronary lumen area stenosis ≥70% were categorized as having significant CAD (CAD Group n=57) and were compared with patients without significant CAD (non-CAD Group n=61). Using TDI, aortic systolic velocity (SAo), early diastolic velocity (EAo), and late diastolic velocity (AAo) were measured from the anterior wall of the ascending aorta 3 cm above the aortic cusps in the parasternal long-axis view. Aortic stiffness index (β), aortic distensibility (D), and pressure-strain elastic modulus (Ep) were calculated from aortic diameters measured by two-dimensional M-mode echocardiography and blood pressure obtained by sphygmomanometry. Results: SAo was significantly higher in the non-CAD group (11.70 ±1.53 cm/s vs.12.80 ±2.21 cm/s, p < 0.05). EAo and AAo velocities of ascending aorta were similar in control and CAD groups. Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) for diagnosing non-CAD, the optimal cut-off value of SAo was ≥13.35 cm/s (sensitivity, 85.96%; specificity, 40.98%; area under curve (AUC)=0.64; P<0.05). There was a significant correlation between SAo velocity and β (r=−0.34, P<0.05), D (r=0.32, P<0.05) and Ep (r =−0.29, P<0.05). Conclusions: Arterial stiffness is lower in patients without significant CAD. Measuring SAo of the anterior ascending aorta using TDI echocardiography has good sensitivity but poor specificity in patients without significant coronary artery stenosis in SAP.
    
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections